White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers received an executive reprieve from having to appear to testify before a Congressional sub-committee inquiry into the White House party crashers. Yet, the committee is planning on pressing forward with a subpoena to have the Virginia couple, Tareq and Michaele Salahi, appear.
A committee spokesman commented that they had heard a third of the story today from Mark Sullivan of the Secret Service and want to here another third from the Salahi's, then 'expecting' the White House to eventually come forward with their side of the story.
This sure sounds biased in my opinion. The White House gives the Social Secretary a pass but who will give the same to the Salahi's? So far, the White House has already 'taken responsibility' for the breach of security and is taking steps to make sure that it doesn't happen again. Many are questioning why the Secret Service would be taking a bullet for the White House Social Secretary and why the White House isn't living by their campaign of transparency.
So, with that being said by the White House, what is the purpose of grilling the Salahi's while Rogers gets off with Executive Privileges? Is that how it all works these days? Those in power get the breaks?
Will these same Congressman and women also be forced to use the SAME health care program that they plan to force on the general public? Why the favoritism?
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your interest in our blog.
All comments are reviewed prior to being posted.